A number of our very own foregoing factors promote credence into assertion one to metaphor is actually a keen analogous term. It is substantiated from the St Thomas’ procedure involved thirteen out of the new Prima Pars , since from inside the post three, as he asks if any name is said properly out of Goodness, brand new opposition brought towards gamble was ranging from incorporate proprie and improprie towards latter recognized having metaphor. Upcoming, into the blog post six, when he requires if the names prominent to Jesus and you may animals is very first said of pets, brand new differences proprie/improprie appears to be a subdivision away from analogous term. St Thomas initiate of the proclaiming cheap write my essay that “in the omnibus nominibus quae de- pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for every respectum ad unum: mais aussi ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur into the definitione omnium. Ainsi que quia ratio quam significat nomen for each and every prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur from inside the definitione aliorum, mais aussi for every single posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant post illud primum vel magis vel without.” This is exactly exemplified because of the old credible, “match.” “Sic thus omni nomina quae metaphorice de Deo dicuntur for each and every prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de Deo: quia dicta de- Deo, nihil aliud significant quam similitudines advertisement tales creaturas.” St. Thomas notices the fresh new resemblance out of ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) suggested in “smiling meadow” plus calling Goodness a great lion.
When he continues to speak away from most other brands “quae non metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo,” this new obvious impression would be the fact he is talking of almost every other instances regarding analogous labels than simply metaphors
Are there texts where St Thomas opposes metaphor and you will analogy? When we turn-to the remarks towards Metaphysics , we discover St Thomas pinpointing “potency” toward analogous and you may equivocal modes. “Potency” function unique. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum advertisement quosdam analogiae.” The fresh equivocal settings out of efficiency are exemplified in addition i talk about step 3 to your 3rd fuel as well as this new cube because the stamina of the line. “Et propter hoc for every quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens inside the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens during the rem” Once again an excellent proportionality notice. That these equivocal modes are indeed metaphors is clear regarding the parallel passage in-book Delta when you look at the leaving comments on what St Thomas begins, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” What makes these methods metaphorical rather than analogical? “Their for this reason modis praetermissis, considerandum est de potentiis, quae reducuntur advertising unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, mais aussi omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur post aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” Basically, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor to analogous spends from a reputation because the second and not the previous include a decrease to help you what is primarily denominated by keyword concerned while, is to it you want citing, regarding the text of one’s Summa i noticed the next before, this new metaphor was not recognized about extension proprie on this foundation. Or is it the way of mention of what is actually principally signifed of the name hence distinguishes metaphor of analogy, use proprie off improprie ? Things entitled metaphorically is actually, at all, taken to getting exactly like exactly what the identity safely is short for.
That which we might be looking is some way of justifying new fairly common distinction regarding metaphor and example in a manner that zero attention is made to Cajetan’s section out-of analogy on attribution and you may proper proportionality
A keen aporia possess obviously came up, for this reason, and its solution could only feel had by the determining what good metaphor are and you can just what an enthusiastic analogous name is. Approaches to these types of inquiries is to permit me to see the apparently conflicting statements of Aquinas.